As in the Second Circuit Vitsaxaki and Third Circuit Heaps cases, this case involves a public school policy facilitating the sex transition of a minor child—not only without parental consent, but in direct defiance of the parent’s instructions to school officials. The Supreme Court has finally taken up this critical current issue. Its recent rulings in Skrmetti and Mahmoud will help the Court reach the correct result. Unlike Mahmoud and some of the other cases, the parental objections raised in Foote are not religious in nature, but NCVI argues that parental rights are nevertheless fundamental and should be upheld.








